An Urgent Call to Arms Against Tyranny

These are turbulent times. Presently, amidst a global pandemic, the right to life and liberty is under attack.

Large corporations and their multi-billion-dollar lobby groups have corrupted many scientists. Through their misleading scientific “evidence”, they have convinced government leaders to pass new laws that benefit only the oligarchs while ordinary citizens are forced to submit to dangerous medical procedures whose known consequences are sometimes deadly, and whose long-term consequences are unknown.

The insane corporatocracy owns the mainstream media channels and has manipulated public opinion through mass hysteria to acquiesce as the last of our civil liberties evaporate before our eyes. It is a mass psychosis, the likes of which has not been seen since Hitler and Stalin. But this time it’s worse. This time the villains are many, and they hide behind a thick veil of corporate secrecy.

We, the legal community of trial lawyers and judges, are the last line of defence for a naive yet innocent public that will generally follow the advice given by health workers, who are well-intentioned followers of government mandates.

The war on wellness can only be won or lost in a courtroom. Clinics and hospitals can only do that which is allowed by law.

We, the trial lawyers and judges in every country, in addition to protecting victims and accused persons for all types of crimes, must now also defend the world from the bogus evidence of the corporate puppeteers. We must be incorruptible. We must not allow ourselves to be fooled by faulty evidence.

There has never been a more important time for our profession. The life and liberty of the world weighs heavily on us. We are called to be the gladiators of our time. Armed with our deep-seated unshakable values, let each of us find the courage to defend the world from tyranny. In law, words are swords. This book is your shield.

Criminal Trial Strategies

The above is the preface to “2022 Criminal Trial Strategies”. This book is available for purchase through Amazon in paperback,  hardcover, and as an instantly-downloadable e-book. To view Patrick Ducharme’s author page on Amazon, click here.

To purchase multiple copies for academic use, contact the author here for a volume discount.

Cannabis Plant May Prevent Cancer

The debate in several countries over the legalization of marijuana only serves to cloud a much more important debate: is cannabis a powerful natural plant capable of acting as a health agent that could prevent cancer? There is bountiful evidence that supports its preventative effectiveness.

Legalization of possession and use of marijuana will arrive in the near future to virtually every country that passes laws based on common sense. That, of course, will leave Canada far removed from the avant-garde as Canadians inexplicably continue to elect a Neanderthal-style government bent on passing new laws that play to the public’s irrational fears that crime is increasing and harsher penalties are the answer. But legalization is only the first step in what is really required– full-scale, properly funded, research into the use of the cannabis plant as a preventative agent against developing cancer.

Canada will no doubt be the last to grasp its own stupidity. The majority of Canadians elected the present federal government with its ‘get tough on crime agenda’; an agenda  that includes minimum mandatory jail sentences for possession of cannabis. The Canadian electorate is hopelessly out of touch with the reality that crime in Canada has been decreasing for more then 23 years and more than half their fellow citizens use or have used marijuana. The get tough on crime legislation includes the senseless incarceration of Canadians for possession, sale or production of cannabis through minimum mandatory jail sentences.

Canadians appear mystifyingly unaware that the downward incidence of crime began long before the present government’s primitive notion that harsher sentences lead to less crime.  Canadians are spectacularly out of touch by their support for minimum mandatory jail terms for possession of cannabis. Instead of enhancing its once admired reputation as a benevolent, tolerant society, the vast majority of Canadians have adopted the barbarous notion of becoming an increasingly intolerant society. And, as soon as the United States of America rectifies its failed policies in the same direction, as promised last week by that country’s attorney general, Canada will stand alone at the pinnacle of repression.

Until a few weeks ago the United States of America was the standard-bearer of intolerance toward its citizens. With millions of its citizens incarcerated for long prison terms on convictions for non-violent crimes such as possession of marijuana, the US has recently admitted the error of its own get tough on crime legislation that held no connection to reality. Their failed approach also cost the US billions of dollars housing non-violent US citizens. US Attorney General Eric Holder said in a speech to the American Bar Association on August 12, 2013 that:

  • “too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long and for no good law enforcement reason”
  • “we cannot simply prosecute or incarcerate our way to becoming a safer nation”
  • “with less than 5% of the world’s population, the United States has almost 1/4 of the world’s prisoners, approximately 2,000,000 inmates, with the rate of incarceration that’s about 6 times higher than China and a correctional tab that’s approximately $80 billion a year”

In effect, Holder was admitting that the US’s get tough on crime legislation, referred to affectionately for years as “the war on drugs”, was an abysmal failure. Holder promised that the US would abandon harsh mandatory sentences for drug offenders and that it would eschew prosecutions for non-violent, low-level criminals whose offenses previously mandated minimum jail terms.

One can only hope that Canadians will not require 20 years of a crime initiative destined to fail before throwing the ideologically-driven miscreants who have authored this right-wing initiative out of office. Legalizing marijuana is a very small step in the right direction. Statistically, far more than a mere majority of Canadians are in favor of legalization. But legalization doesn’t go nearly far enough. It only makes possible the ability to study and perfect ways to make the cannabis plant available for prevention of cancer. As long as cannabis remains a part of some misguided war on drugs it can never be seriously considered medicinally.

Some will say that our courts’ recognition of its usefulness in lessening pain for terminally ill cancer patients is a sign that Canadians are somewhat enlightened. Wrong. Allowing a few Canadians, after navigating their way through a labyrinth of useless regulations, to smoke marijuana cigarettes to ease their pain and anxiety before cancer claims their life, is not the answer. It does not even scratch the surface of what could probably be accomplished by the proper medicinal use of the cannabis plant.  Serious and properly funded study of the healing properties of the cannabis plant is needed.

Because the plant grows naturally, it will not enjoy the enormous resources of the big pharmaceutical companies.  In fact, whatever Big Pharma cannot patent they work sedulously to oppose. The proper study of the preventative possibilities of cannabis will be no different. Look to the pharmaceutical lobbyists to purposefully attempt to scuttle any serious effort in that direction. They are not interested in curing cancer–to do so would eliminate the need for their expensive drugs. Big Pharma has infiltrated the medical community and carefully guided it down a failed course of “treatment” that defies logic. Powerful destructive drugs classified as “chemotherapy” have proved to be a thundering disappointment.  The medical community now accepts that we do not cure cancer, but instead, manage it. Big Pharma makes billions in its management.

Real change will only come when the people demand it. Politicians are unlikely to lead the charge for change as long as the pharmaceutical companies continue to control them through political donations and influential lobbyists.  And, the medical community has likewise fallen into lock-step with Big Pharma, pumping out doctors who mindlessly cling to the status quo of cancer treatment despite over 4 decades of dismal failure by treating cancer by burning, cutting and poisoning.   The few that dare to challenge the status quo are quickly labeled as quacks. They are ridiculed out of existence. It was approximately 42 years ago that Richard Nixon declared war on cancer.  Our lack of success in treating cancer then remains the same today.  Small wonder we now humbly claim only to manage, not cure.

We are not speaking here of “smoking” anything. Instead, we’re speaking of wringing from the cannabis plant what many have discovered as its apparent ability to prevent cancer. Obviously, preventing cancer is better than curing it.[1] All of us have cancer cells. Currently, our medical community spends virtually all of its time and money on treating cancer patients and very little of its resources on prevention of cancer.  For at least 4 decades the archaic approach of our medical community to “treating” cancer has been to cut burn and poison. Big Pharma is the only beneficiary of our failed attempts to treat cancer. It is in their interest, and their interest alone, to keep patients alive long enough to use their expensive but ineffective drugs. Chemotherapy kills. It does not cure.

Our medical community needs to balance its approach to cancer if it ever hopes to have any meaningful impact. The cannabis plant may hold the answer. Michael Ducharme writes:

Every cell (including cancer cells) have a cannabinoid receptor (there are two types, called CB1 or CB2). The receptor is similar to a lock that waits for a specific key. In this case the keys are cannabinoids, which are found most abundantly in the cannabis plant, and are also produced in very small numbers by the human body itself and in the cacao plant.

When these locks receive their special key, all 212 cell types are regulated. This means that if the cell is cancerous, it either becomes noncancerous or dies. the noncancerous cells are also improved, not harmed. For example, an overactive immune system (which attacks healthy cells and causes diseases including arthritis and many more) will reduce its activity to a healthy level.[2]

Permitting consumption of cannabis is, we hope, a very small step in the direction of funding scientific research on the medical benefits that might be derived from the cannabis plant. Dr. J. Michael Bostwick has suggested:

…federal policy has failed to keep pace with recent scientific advances” including the recently-discovered endocannabinoid system, which (in an article published by the Mayo Clinic) he called “a finely tuned physiologic modulator.  Michael Ducharme also writes that Dr. Bostwick noted that cannabis may have “analgesic, appetite-modulatory, immunosuppressant, antiemetic, neuroleptic, or antineoplastic effects, among other possibilities.[3]

Consequently, what is needed is for governments everywhere to get out of the way of much-needed research on the potential preventative properties that cannabis may afford.  The debate over legalization is interesting, but far less important than clearing the way to properly funded research. Until that happens governments standing in the way of research in relation to the cannabis plant will be like the crayfish, crawling backwards into the future.

[1] See: Cancer: Causes, Prevention and Cure by Michael J. Ducharme

published at

[2] Ibid.

[3] As quoted in note 1.

Calling All Carnivores

Meat eaters everywhere were probably captivated by the story of Backstreet Bully, the well-known Canadian racehorse that was slaughtered in early January 2013 as meat for human consumption. As a competitive racehorse, his meat would be laced with potentially deadly performance-enhancing drugs. But for Health Canada, the agency charged with the responsibility of protecting humans from meat not fit for human consumption, Backstreet Bully was no different than many racehorses slaughtered every year then packaged for human food. The same can be said for the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), operating under the Department of Justice for the Federal Government and responsible for the administration and enforcement of Canada’s agricultural products. No apologies or explanations from either organization. They sure know how to make us feel safe!

Ignore for the moment the abuses heaped upon these poor animals during their competitive lives. Ignore the fact that race folks fill these horses with nasty cancer-causing drugs such as nitrfurazone and bute in the interest of entertainment. Ignore that these horses become living pharmaceutical train wrecks, destined for painful, disease-ridden deaths. The real question for the moment is what drugs are the Health Canada and CFIA inspectors consuming? Apparently, it is not bad enough that they allow our horses to become drug junkies, but then they allow their dead carcasses to be packaged up for our dining pleasure! We owe a debt of gratitude to these inspectors for having our backs when it comes to food safety.

According to Health Canada’s website, they are the arm of the Federal government responsible for helping Canadians maintain and improve their health. Really? This is a maintenance and improvement program we could do without. These horses are not suitable for human consumption. Health Canada’s mandate is to enforce legislation in place to prevent these occurrences by conducting investigations, inspections, seizures and prosecutions.  We know this because their website proclaims it to be so.  Unfortunately, their investigations and inspections are seldom, sporadic and obviously far from thorough. They are mostly negligent. And, as a result, Canadians and other nations that buy our meat products risk the health of their citizens assuming incorrectly that Health Canada and the CFIA are functioning properly and responsibly.

And, it’s a mistake to assume that the negligence of these government agencies is limited to drug laden horsemeat. Canada has an unenviable record of discovering other forms of tainted meat long after outbreaks of E coli contamination. In October 2012, for example, XL Foods of Alberta dumped hundreds of tonnes of frozen beef into a landfill in the Brooks Alberta but not until they were ordered to do so after a massive outbreak of E coli erupted in late August and early September of that year. The fall out from this catastrophe and others caused the Federal Government enough embarrassment that Government officials began to claim that they were prepared to pass legislation aimed at making the food system safer. So its more legislation they need! I would’ve thought it was more competent inspectors.

The promise of legislation should be completely unnecessary according to Harpreet Kochhar, executive director of the CFIA who boldly boasts that, “no meat enters the food supply unless we actually tested it and make sure that it is safe”.  Apparently tainted does enter the food supply—and in significant quantities.

Sadly, Kochhar presides over an inept organization that lacks the manpower or systems to protect anyone. In fact, it took this E. coli outbreak to “review its observations of deboning and cutting activities, specific E. coli controls, meat hygiene, sampling techniques and overall sanitation in the plant” according to CFIA spokesman Paul Mayers. It is not clear how any new legislation is going to improve this process.  One suspects this rhetoric is the type nonsense spewed by the government hoping to allay the fears of its citizens while carrying on as though it’s business as usual. In fact, XL Foods was back in business in a few weeks.

Canada does not have the only impoverished system of protection for the public. Last year at a public fair in Cleveland 38 people were infected with E. coli, including a 2-year-old boy who died and at least 7 more people suffered kidney failure. 3 of those suffering kidney failure have now been placed on dialysis permanently. This past February France’s agricultural minister confirmed that 3 horse carcasses tainted with a veterinary drug harmful to humans had entered France’s food chain. The 3 carcasses were among 6 sent to France from the UK that contained the drug phenylbutazone, also known as bute–used as a pain killer in horses, especially racehorses like Backstreet Bully.

France’s president François Hollande promised tighter controls and mandatory labeling so as to advise consumers of the origin of meat presented for sale.  Perhaps Canada could send France it’s new legislation when it’s drafted.  Based upon recent Canadian legislation it’ll probably have a high-sounding title, something like, “The Safe Foods Act.”  The new law will fit nicely alongside “The Safe Streets Act”  and “Stand Up for Victims of Crime” and other lofty sounding law titles that sound good and lack substance. Substance requires performance. Government talk is virtually always cheap.

Big companies are now confessing to having sold products containing the DNA of horsemeat although none should exist in their products. After Irish investigators found horse DNA in hamburger products sold to the public, that government launched a major investigation. The UK Food Standards Agency recently released results that found 6 new beef products that tested positive for horsemeat. A follow-up investigation by the same agency discovered another 29 beef products that contained horse DNA. Nestle, Sodexo and Birds Eye, all major worldwide food producers, have launched massive recalls of their products based on similar testings.  Apparently no one uses old horses to make glue anymore.

Where does all this leave the consumer? It should leave them wary of their government’s ability to ensure their safety from foods that are readily available for public consumption. While the problem exists across the entire food industry, nowhere is it more pronounced than in the beef industry. Oh, excuse me, perhaps we should now refer to it as the horse/pig/poultry/E coli industry. If Popeye’s sidekick Wimpy were still around, he would be borrowing money from Popeye for something other than a hamburger.