 |
| Patrick J Ducharme |
An arrest is the compulsory restraint of a person. Touching the arrestee is not required if the arrestee submits to the restraint of his liberty. Arrests may be made by use of reasonable force or by words or a restraint of liberty that is accompanied by submission. If touching is not sufficient, and reasonable force is necessary, then the use of force is permitted.1
Continue reading “What Constitutes an Arrest?”
 |
| Patrick Ducharme |
A peace officer may not arrest a person without warrant for a summary conviction offence, a hybrid offence or an absolute jurisdiction offence unless it is necessary to do so having regard to the need to establish the identity of the person, to secure or preserve evidence, or to prevent the continuation or repetition of the offence or the commission of another.1 Although a peace officer is deemed to be acting lawfully and in the execution of his duty, if he disregards the requirement not to arrest in these circumstances, it may lead to a remedy pursuant to section 9 of the Charter as an arbitrary detention.
The above is the an excerpt of Patrick J Ducharme's book, Canadian Criminal Procedure, available at Amazon or in bulk through MedicaLegal Publishing along with Criminal Trial Strategies.
Subscribe to Patrick Ducharme's Youtube Channel
 |
| Patrick Ducharme |
Even if an accused successfully challenges the constitutional validity of an arrest warrant a peace officer that arrests the accused on a warrant, that appears valid on its face, acts in the execution of her duty.
The above is the an excerpt of Patrick J Ducharme's book, Canadian Criminal Procedure, available at Amazon or in bulk through MedicaLegal Publishing along with Criminal Trial Strategies.
Subscribe to Patrick Ducharme's Youtube Channel
| |
| Patrick J Ducharme |
Police officer conduct is considered to be lawful when it falls within the general scope of a duty imposed on the officer, either by statute or at common law. The officer’s actions, even if they interfere with liberty or property, must be necessary for carrying out the particular police duty and must also be reasonable in the circumstances. A peace officer that acts outside his powers does not act within the course or execution of his duty in respect of charges of obstruction, resistance, assault, disarming or murder. A peace officer acting outside his powers may himself be subject to criminal charges.
Continue reading “Execution of Duty”
| |
| Patrick Ducharme |
A peace officer must orally identify herself before entering a private residence, unless there are exigent circumstances. A proper announcement is necessary even when the door is open, unless it can be said that the open door, in all the circumstances, represented an express or implied invitation to the peace officer to enter. Otherwise, the peace officer becomes a trespasser.1 A Judge who authorizes a peace officer to enter a dwelling house may also authorize the peace officer to enter the dwelling house without prior announcement if the Judge is satisfied, by information on oath, that there are reasonable grounds to believe the prior announcement of the entry would expose the peace officer or other person to imminent bodily harm or death or result in the imminent loss or imminent destruction of evidence relating to the commission of an indictable offence.2 Section 529.4 provides as follows:
Continue reading “Proper Announcements”
| |
| Patrick Ducharme |
Either a Judge or Justice may issue a warrant authorizing a peace officer to enter a dwelling house for the purpose of arresting a person. The issuing judicial officer must be satisfied that the person will be present in the dwelling house.1 Arrests within a dwelling house require additional authorization in the form of a warrant, or, exigent circumstances.
Continue reading “Entry into Dwelling Houses with Warrant”
| |
| Patrick J Ducharme |
…The trial Judge noted that “the connection of the search to the arrest is not disputed” (para. 27). Notwithstanding Berger J.A.’s view to the contrary, we conclude that the trial Judge made no error in concluding that the search was properly incidental to arrest, and did not violate s. 8 of the Charter.
Continue reading “Lawfulness of the Search Incident to Arrest “
| |
| Patrick Ducharme |
In R. v. Loewen the Supreme Court of Canada dealt with the following circumstances as given by the investigating officer:
After stopping the accused for speeding, the police officer smelled freshly burnt marijuana coming from the vehicle and found $5,410 in the accused’s pocket. He arrested the accused for possession of a controlled substance, searched the vehicle, and found 100 grams of crack cocaine. The trial Judge admitted the evidence of cocaine. The accused was convicted of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking. A majority of the Court of Appeal upheld the conviction.
Continue reading “Grounds of Arrest – R. v. Loewen”
| |
| Patrick J Ducharme |
The arresting person must have both “objective” and “subjective” grounds to arrest an accused for the commission of an indictable offence. Consequently, a court reviewing the grounds of arrest must conclude that the person making the arrest believes objectively that the grounds exist and that a reasonable person, in the position of the arresting person, would objectively believe that reasonable and probable grounds exist to justify the arrest. The absence of either objective or subjective grounds renders the arrest unlawful.
Continue reading “Grounds of Arrest”
| |
| Patrick Ducharme |
Private citizens who witness a breach of the peace are justified in preventing its continuation or renewal and may arrest the person breaching the peace for the purposes of surrendering that person to a peace officer.1 The common law concept of “breach of the peace” is not statutorily defined. It is usually an act or actions that result in actual or threatened harm to another person. Consider sections 30 and 31 of the Code:
Continue reading “Preventing a Breach of the Peace”
